Vampires Book Of Shadows

Front Page | Magick Wish-List | My Current Resume | Custom-Personal Mp3's | NLP FAST & FREE | NLP Magick-Mirror | New Age Hypnosis | Black-Magick Defined | Witch-lore Voodoo | The Kheprian Charge | Dreamers Job ? | Message Board | Goth Magick | Genuine Faith ? | The Devils Origins? | The Vampire; Jesus | My Banner's | The Grand Grimoire | OBE 1974 | The Life Force... | Exoteric Vampireism ? | Game-Room | Free NLP Assist | Importance Of Core Belief | My Last Letter To God | The Ancient Gods | Extracting Raw Energy | Weapons Of Warfare | Secrets Of The Ancient Egyptian Priest's | Vampire-Magick | Creating Your Servants | MoJo Magic In A Bottle | Laws Of 3X3...? | Science Vs Religious Fiction | False Witnessing? | Short-cut Thru Angel Magick | Secret Of The Sorcerer | Biology Of Reincarnation | Secret About Faith | Flaws Of Eden... | Good Vs "Evil | The Quantum View | Streets Of Gold? | From; Ash To Ash | The Genesis Factor | 'FREE Subliminal Mp3 Tools | Contact Me | Your Classified Ads

The Devils Origins?

Vampire Music Videos

Click here to visit Revolution Distribution.

Get Your FREE Classified Ads Posted Today

Free Classifieds


The Best SEO Tools

Part Of;  Craigs Underground Press

The Best SEO Tools

Goth Wear

Mega Sale at Prank Place! - Up to 60% Off!


Vampire-Nation Portal


Add URL Pro - Search
                  Engine Submission and Optimization Services

The Webmasters Open Data-base; LW Craig

LW Craig Family Webshots

Gothic Wear



Dooms Day Refreshment Committee............

The Devils Origin's?
“Where In The Devil Did Lucifer Come From..?”

In the original Hebrew text, the fourteenth chapter of Isaiah is not about a fallen angel, but about a fallen Babylonian king, who during his lifetime had persecuted the children of Israel. It contains no mention of Satan, either by name or reference. 

The Hebrew scholar could only speculate that some early Christian scribes, writing in the Latin tongue used by the Church, had decided for themselves that they wanted the story to be about a fallen angel, a creature not even mentioned in the original Hebrew text, and to whom they gave the name "Lucifer." 

Why Lucifer? In Roman astronomy, Lucifer was the name given to the morning star (the star we now know by another Roman name, Venus). The morning star appears in the heavens just before dawn, heralding the rising sun. 

The name derives from the Latin term lucem ferre, bringer, or bearer, of light." In the Hebrew text the expression used to describe the Babylonian king before his death is Helal, son of Shahar, which can best be translated as "Day star, son of the Dawn." The name evokes the golden glitter of a proud king's dress and court (much as his personal splendor earned for King Louis XIV of France the appellation, "The Sun King").

The scholars authorized by ... King James “the first”, to translate the Bible into current English did not use the original Hebrew texts, but used versions translated ... largely by St. Jerome in the fourth century. Jerome had mistranslated the Hebraic metaphor, "Day star, son of the Dawn," as "Lucifer," and over the centuries a metamorphosis took place. Lucifer the morning star became a disobedient angel, cast out of heaven to rule eternally in hell. 

Theologians, writers, and poets interwove the myth with the doctrine of the fall, and in Christian tradition Lucifer is now the same as Satan, the Devil, and --- ironically --- the Prince of Darkness. 

So "Lucifer" is nothing more than an ancient Latin name for the morning star, the bringer of light. That can be confusing for Christians who identify Christ himself as the morning star, a term used as a central theme in many Christian sermons. Jesus refers to himself as the morning star in Revelation 22:16: "I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things unto the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star." 

And so there are those who do not read beyond the King James Version of the Bible, who say 'Lucifer is Satan: so says our KJV original mosaic text'...." Henry Neufeld; (a Christian who comments on difficult biblical issues) goes on to say;

"This passage is often related to Satan, and a similar thought is expressed in Luke 10:18 by Jesus, that was not its first meaning. It's primary meaning is given in Isaiah 14:4 which says that when Israel is restored they will "take up this taunt against the king of Babylon . . ." Verse 12 is a part of this taunt song. This passage refers first to the fall of that earthly king...

How does the confusion in translating this verse arise? The Hebrew of this passage reads: "heleyl, ben shachar" which can be literally translated "shining one, (or) son of the dawn." This phrase means, again literally, the planet Venus when it appears as a morning star. In the Septuagint, a 3rd century BC translation of the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek, it is translated as "heosphoros" which also means Venus as a morning star. 

How did the translation "Lucifer" arise? This word comes from Jerome's Latin Vulgate. Was Jerome in error? Not at all. In Latin at that time, "Lucifer" actually meant Venus as a morning star. Isaiah is using this metaphor for a bright light, though not the greatest light to illustrate the apparent power of the Babylonian king which had then faded." 

Therefore, Lucifer wasn't equated with Satan until after Jerome. Jerome wasn't in error. Later Christians (and Mormons) were In Equating "Lucifer" with "Satan".

So why is this a problem to Christians? Christians now generally believe that Satan (or the Devil or Lucifer who they equate with Satan) is a being who has always existed (or who was created at or near the "beginning"). Therefore, they also think that the 'prophets' of the Old Testament believed in this creature. 

The Isaiah scripture is used as proof (and has been used as such for hundreds of years now). As Elaine Pagels explains though, the concept of Satan has evolved over the years and the early Bible writers didn't believe in or teach such a doctrine.

The irony for those who believe that "Lucifer" refers to Satan is that the same title ('morning star' or 'light-bearer') is used to refer to Jesus, in 2 Peter 1:19, where the Greek text has exactly the same term: 'phos-phoros' 'light-bearer.' This is also the term used for Jesus in Revelation 22:16- where Jesus states; “I am the bright & morning-star!” 

So why is Lucifer a far bigger problem to Mormons? Mormons claim that an ancient record (the Book of Mormon) was written beginning in about 600 BC, and the author in 600 BC supposedly copied Isaiah in Isaiah's original words. When Joseph Smith pretended to translate the supposed 'ancient record', he included the Lucifer verse in the Book of Mormon. Obviously he wasn't copying what Isaiah actually wrote. He was copying the King James Version of the Bible. 

Another book of LDS scripture, the Doctrine & Covenants, furthers this problem in 76:26 when it affirms the false Christian doctrine that "Lucifer" means Satan. This incorrect doctrine also spread into a third set of Mormon scriptures, the Pearl of Great Price, which describes a war in heaven based, in part, on Joseph Smith's a new sun in the solar system which is correct since the new sun is a second 'morning star' of the 'original' 'light-bearing' substance--not some evil being of religious mythology.